His Platform Has 280,000 Creators. The Ones Making Real Money Are the Oldest Ones.
Trybe founder Lukas Pakter says his top earners right now are older men and women — and he's paying them on sales, not views.

Lukas Pakter runs a creator platform with roughly 280,000 people on it. Asked recently who is actually making money, he did not describe a 22-year-old with a ring light.
Pakter, founder of the creator-sales platform Trybe and an activewear brand, said the creators earning the most on Trybe are older men and women. "The creators that make a ton of money on Trybe, at least as of the last couple of weeks, have been like older women, older men," he said. The platform has about 280,000 creators.
This isn't an engagement claim
That distinction is the whole story. Pakter pays creators roughly 10% of the sales their ads generate. Creators on the platform commonly earn 10% to 15% of the sales their content drives, with the brand setting the rate.
So when he says older creators are earning the most, he isn't talking about likes, watch time or comment sections. He's talking about who moves product. The money only exists if somebody buys.
His explanation is one coaches will recognize immediately. Pakter said older creators can start earning faster because audiences find them "more trustworthy." He said an "overwhelming majority" of his own brand's fastest-growing creators are "older guys," and he advised brands to sample and recruit them.
The operator behind the opinion
This is not a man theorizing from a newsletter. Pakter said his brand generated $1 million in 2024 and a little under $9 million last year, and he projected $70 million to $80 million this year. The brand now runs about 8,000 creatives a month, and he said customer acquisition cost fell from about $89 a year ago to $29.
Trybe launched in March 2026 and reports more than 17,000 brands on the platform.
He's also unimpressed by the shortcut everyone is being sold. Pakter dismissed platforms claiming AI can run an entire creative engine as "horseshit."
Why this lands differently for coaches
The obvious caveat: this is direct-to-consumer product advertising, not a $9,000 leadership package. Nobody buys an executive coaching container the way they buy leggings, and Pakter's own framing is modest — he was describing the last couple of weeks of payouts, not a longitudinal study.
But the mechanism he's describing is the one coaching runs on. Perceived credibility shortens the distance between seeing someone and believing them. Decades of actual work read on a face as proof. That's the single asset a 52-year-old has in abundance and a 24-year-old cannot manufacture, and it's apparently worth real commission dollars on a performance-paid platform.
The short-form industry has spent five years telling experienced professionals they arrived too late, that the camera belongs to people who grew up on it. Here's an operator with sales attribution running through his own ad account telling brands the opposite: go find the older ones, send them samples, put them to work.
Sources
Editor’s note: Half our readers quietly believe they're too old to go on camera. Here's a founder with sales data saying the opposite out loud.
Keep reading
Arizona State Will Now Give You a Degree in the Thing You Sell a $997 Course About
Three universities turned audience-building into accredited coursework in a single year. Every coach selling a personal-brand program now has an unusual competitor.

LinkedIn Says Founders on the Platform Are Up 70%. Now It's Rebuilding the Feed Around Them.
A second feed, a creator dashboard and paid consultations booked inside the profile. For coaches, LinkedIn just changed what a post is worth.

54% of Coaches Say Better Technology Is the Priority. 6% Actually Use an AI Tool.
The ICF surveyed 10,035 coaches in 127 countries. The gap between what coaches intend and what they've installed is enormous.

She Didn't Launch a Course. She Co-Founded an App — and It Hit No. 34 in the App Store.
A London studio just raised $2 million to co-found software with creators instead of licensing their names. The model has implications for every expert sitting on an audience.
